Crypto Exchange Feature Checker
Check if an exchange meets essential criteria for safe, functional cryptocurrency trading
Web3.World is a crypto exchange that exists - but barely. If you're looking for a place to trade Bitcoin, Ethereum, or even lesser-known tokens, this isn't it. As of late 2024, Web3.World supports only two cryptocurrencies and just two trading pairs. That’s not a startup quirk. That’s a red flag.
What Web3.World Actually Offers
According to CoinGecko, the most reliable source for exchange data, Web3.World lists exactly two coins and two trading pairs. No more. No less. There’s no public documentation, no whitepaper, no developer API, and no mobile app. You won’t find any tutorials on how to deposit, trade, or withdraw. No YouTube walkthroughs. No Reddit threads. No Trustpilot reviews. Nothing.
This isn’t like trying out a new DEX like Uniswap or PancakeSwap, which support thousands of tokens across multiple blockchains. Web3.World doesn’t even feel like a beta. It feels like a placeholder. A name registered on a domain, with a basic interface, and nothing else.
Why It Doesn’t Compare to Real Exchanges
Compare this to Binance, Coinbase, or Bybit - all top exchanges in 2025. They offer:
- 500+ cryptocurrencies
- Fiat on-ramps (buy crypto with USD, EUR, GBP)
- Mobile apps with real-time alerts
- Advanced order types (limit, stop-loss, trailing stops)
- API access for bots and traders
- Clear fee structures and transparent security audits
Web3.World has none of these. Not even one. It doesn’t accept credit cards. It doesn’t have a wallet built in. It doesn’t connect to MetaMask or Trust Wallet through WalletConnect. You can’t even find out if it’s non-custodial - a core promise of decentralized exchanges.
Who Is This For? (Spoiler: Almost No One)
If you’re a developer testing a new blockchain protocol and need to swap two obscure testnet tokens, maybe Web3.World is a tool. But even then, you’d be better off using a testnet DEX on Ethereum or Polygon.
If you’re a retail trader looking to grow your portfolio? Skip it. There’s zero liquidity. No price depth. No volume. Even if you could trade, slippage would be insane. You’d be lucky to get filled at the price you see.
And if you’re looking for security? Good luck. There’s no public audit report. No bug bounty program. No mention of insurance or cold storage. No team names. No LinkedIn profiles. No company registration details. That’s not decentralization - that’s obscurity.
Web3.World in the Bigger Picture
The Web3 ecosystem exploded in 2024. Bitcoin ETFs launched. Institutional money flowed in. Wallets like Trust Wallet added support for Cosmos, Solana, and NFTs. DeFi protocols grew. Exchanges added staking, lending, and yield farming.
Web3.World didn’t grow with it. It stayed frozen. No updates. No announcements. No roadmap. No community engagement. It’s like a store that opened in 2022, put up a sign, and never stocked the shelves.
Meanwhile, platforms like Uniswap and SushiSwap have processed trillions in volume. They’re constantly improving. They have developer grants. They host hackathons. They list new tokens based on community votes. Web3.World? Nothing.
Alternatives That Actually Work
If you want a true decentralized exchange with real functionality, here are better options:
- Uniswap (Ethereum) - Supports 10,000+ tokens, deep liquidity, open-source, widely audited.
- PancakeSwap (BSC) - Low fees, fast trades, popular for new tokens.
- Raydium (Solana) - High speed, low cost, great for Solana-based tokens.
- OKX and Bybit - If you want centralized but reliable, with fiat on-ramps and advanced tools.
These platforms have user bases in the millions. They have customer support. They have apps. They have transparency. Web3.World has none of that.
Final Verdict: Don’t Use It
Web3.World isn’t a crypto exchange you should consider. It’s not a hidden gem. It’s not a promising startup. It’s a ghost. A digital mirage.
There’s no evidence it’s being maintained. No proof it’s secure. No way to verify its operations. And with only two trading pairs, it’s functionally useless for anyone beyond a curious observer.
If you see a link to Web3.World, close it. Don’t connect your wallet. Don’t send any tokens. Don’t waste your time.
The crypto space is full of real opportunities. Don’t get distracted by empty shells. Stick with platforms that have users, history, and transparency. That’s how you trade safely - not by betting on a name with no substance.
Is Web3.World a safe crypto exchange?
No. Web3.World has no public security audits, no team information, no customer support, and no track record. It doesn’t even list its security practices. Connecting your wallet to it carries high risk - you could lose funds with no recourse.
Can I buy Bitcoin on Web3.World?
No. Web3.World only supports two coins and two trading pairs, neither of which is Bitcoin. Even if you wanted to trade other tokens, the platform lacks the infrastructure to support major cryptocurrencies.
Does Web3.World have a mobile app?
No. There is no official mobile app for Web3.World. You can’t trade on the go. You can’t receive alerts. You can’t even verify your account from a phone. This is a major red flag compared to every major exchange in 2025.
Why doesn’t Web3.World appear on top exchange lists?
Because it doesn’t meet basic criteria. Top exchange lists like those from Cryptoninjas.net, Kraken, and CoinGecko evaluate trading volume, asset support, security, user base, and features. Web3.World has none of these. It’s not ranked because it’s not functional enough to be considered.
Is Web3.World a scam?
There’s no direct evidence it’s a scam, but it behaves like one. It lacks transparency, has no user base, no updates, and no documentation. Most legitimate projects share their roadmap, team, and progress. Web3.World shares nothing. Treat it as high-risk until proven otherwise.
Can I use Web3.World with MetaMask or Trust Wallet?
Technically, you might be able to connect your wallet if the site supports WalletConnect - but there’s no confirmation this works. Even if it does, there’s no reason to. With only two trading pairs and no liquidity, you’d be trading in a vacuum. It’s not worth the risk.
jonathan dunlow
Man, I’ve seen so many of these ghost exchanges pop up over the years - it’s like a bad horror movie where the monster never shows up but the lights keep flickering. Web3.World isn’t even a ghost, it’s the echo of a ghost. I remember back in 2021 when some dude launched a site called ‘CryptoNest’ with three tokens and zero liquidity - turned out he was just mining wallet addresses for phishing. This feels exactly like that. No team, no updates, no roadmap, no nothing. If you’re thinking of connecting your wallet, just don’t. Your funds will vanish faster than your motivation after a 12-hour Zoom call.
And don’t even get me started on how people still fall for this stuff. It’s not ignorance, it’s hope. Hope that this time, it’s different. But it’s not. The blockchain world moves fast, but this? This is frozen in 2018. And trust me, 2018 was already too late for this kind of nonsense.
Stick to Uniswap. Stick to PancakeSwap. Hell, even use a centralized exchange if you need fiat on-ramps. At least those places have customer support that doesn’t reply with a 404 error. This? This is digital graffiti on a bathroom wall. Pretty, but pointless.
I’ve seen devs build entire DeFi protocols on top of nothing but a GitHub repo and a Discord server - but even they had *something*. Web3.World doesn’t even have a Discord. No Twitter. No Medium. No GitHub. Nothing. Just a website that looks like it was built in Wix during a 3 a.m. panic attack. Don’t be the guy who lost his ETH because he thought ‘Web3’ sounded cool.
Real innovation doesn’t hide. It shouts. And this? This is whispering into a void.
And if you’re reading this and still considering it - I’m not judging. I’ve been there. I once sent $200 to a site called ‘BitFrog’ because the logo had a frog wearing a hat. I learned my lesson. Don’t make the same mistake. Save your coins. Save your sanity.
Just close the tab. Seriously. You’ll thank yourself later.
Mariam Almatrook
One cannot help but observe, with a mixture of academic distaste and profound existential dismay, the proliferation of such vacuous digital artifacts masquerading as financial infrastructure. The very notion that an entity bearing the nomenclature of a paradigm-shifting technological movement - Web3 - could be reduced to a two-token, zero-transparency, zero-accountability placeholder is not merely lamentable; it is a grotesque perversion of the foundational ethos upon which decentralized systems were purportedly erected.
One might reasonably expect that in an age wherein blockchain technology has been embraced by sovereign wealth funds, institutional custodians, and even central banks experimenting with digital currencies, that a platform bearing the moniker ‘Web3.World’ would at least aspire to meet the baseline criteria of operational legitimacy. Instead, we are presented with a digital husk - a hollowed-out shell of semantic aspiration, bereft of substance, devoid of audit, and utterly bereft of accountability. This is not decentralization. This is not innovation. This is performative nihilism dressed in blockchain jargon.
One must also question the sociological underpinnings of such a phenomenon: Who, pray tell, is the intended user? The technologically naïve? The desperate? The gullible? The answer, regrettably, is all three. And therein lies the true tragedy - not the existence of Web3.World, but the fact that anyone still believes in its possibility.
Let us not confuse obscurity with security. Let us not mistake silence for sovereignty. This platform is not a hidden gem - it is a buried landmine, and those who reach for it do so at the peril of their financial autonomy.
I implore you: do not be complicit in the normalization of this digital decay. Withdraw your gaze. Withdraw your trust. Withdraw your wallet.
Regina Jestrow
Okay but… why does this even exist? Like, who sat down and thought, ‘Hey, let’s make a crypto exchange… but only for two coins and absolutely nothing else’? It’s like opening a restaurant with only water and salt on the menu. You’re not serving food - you’re serving a question mark.
I checked the site out of curiosity. The UI looks like it was designed in 2015 by someone who thought ‘Web3’ meant putting a gradient background and calling it ‘decentralized.’ No documentation. No contact info. No Twitter. Nothing. I even scrolled through the source code - there’s literally a comment that says ‘TODO: add real features.’ That’s not a beta. That’s a confession.
And the worst part? Someone’s probably already lost money here. Not because they were greedy - because they were hopeful. And that’s the real danger. Not scams. Hope.
Martin Hansen
LMAO. You call this a review? This is a eulogy for a website that never lived. I’ve seen more substance in a Discord DM from a rugpull artist. At least those guys had a whitepaper written by a GPT-4 bot. This? This is a placeholder domain bought by a guy who got tired of building NFT galleries and just gave up. No one’s trading here. No one’s even visiting. I bet the server logs show more bot traffic than actual humans.
And you know what’s funnier? People still link to this like it’s some secret alpha. Bro, if your exchange doesn’t have a mobile app in 2025, you’re not a disruptor - you’re a museum exhibit.
Stop giving this thing oxygen. It’s not a startup. It’s a tombstone with a .com.
Lore Vanvliet
OMG I CAN’T BELIEVE YOU’RE EVEN TALKING ABOUT THIS SITE LIKE IT’S REAL 😭 I SAW THIS ON A TIKTOK AD AND THOUGHT IT WAS A JOKE BUT THEN MY COWORKER SAID SHE ‘TRIED IT’ AND LOST HER WHOLE $500 PORTFOLIO 😭😭😭 SHE THOUGHT ‘WEB3’ MEANT ‘SAFE’ 😭 I TOLD HER IT WAS A SCAM BUT SHE SAID ‘BUT THE LOGO LOOKED PROFESSIONAL’ 🤦♀️ I’M SO MAD I COULD CRY 😭😭😭 WE NEED TO SHUT THIS DOWN BEFORE MORE PEOPLE GET SCAMMED 😭😭😭 #Web3Scam #DontConnectYourWallet
Scott Sơn
Let me tell you what this is - it’s not an exchange. It’s a vibe. A vibe of pure, uncut, unapologetic chaos. It’s the crypto equivalent of showing up to a rave with no music, no lights, and just a guy holding a sign that says ‘I believe in decentralization.’
I’ve seen projects rise from nothing. I’ve seen teams vanish overnight. But this? This is art. Performance art. The artist didn’t want to build a platform - they wanted to see how long the internet would keep pretending it’s real.
And guess what? It’s been two years. People are still linking to it. People are still asking if it’s safe. People are still wondering if they missed the secret alpha.
It’s not a failure. It’s a masterpiece.
And if you’re still reading this instead of closing the tab? You’re part of the exhibit.
Stanley Wong
I get why people are mad about this but I also think we should be careful not to demonize every obscure project. Maybe Web3.World started as a side project for a grad student who got busy with their thesis. Maybe they meant to build it out but life happened. Maybe they’re just quiet builders.
That said, I agree it’s not usable right now. But the fact that no one’s talking about it doesn’t mean it’s evil. It just means it’s not ready. We’ve all had projects that died on the vine. The problem isn’t the site - it’s the expectation that every Web3 project should be a billion-dollar exchange on day one.
Still, I wouldn’t connect my wallet. Just because it’s not malicious doesn’t mean it’s safe. Better safe than sorry. But let’s not turn every quiet project into a villain. Some of us just need time.
Nicole Parker
There’s something deeply sad about Web3.World. Not because it’s a scam - but because it’s a ghost of what we thought crypto could be. We used to dream of open, permissionless systems where anyone could build something meaningful. Now we’re stuck with either corporate giants or abandoned GitHub repos with one commit from 2021.
I used to be excited about this space. Now I just feel tired. This site isn’t just useless - it’s a symbol of how far we’ve drifted from the original promise. It’s not about two tokens or no app. It’s about the loss of belief. When no one shows up to build, no one shows up to use, and no one even remembers why we started - that’s when the dream dies.
I don’t blame the creators. I blame the culture. We reward hype, not hours. We cheer for moonshots, not milestones. We don’t celebrate the quiet builders. We only notice the loud ones - until they vanish.
Maybe Web3.World is just a mirror. And what it reflects back at us isn’t a broken exchange. It’s a broken promise.
Kenneth Ljungström
Just wanted to say I appreciate this breakdown - super clear and super needed. I’ve seen so many newbies get lured into sketchy sites like this thinking ‘if it says Web3 it must be legit.’
Big shoutout to you for listing real alternatives too. Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Raydium - those are the ones that actually matter. And yeah, if you want ease of use, OKX and Bybit are solid. No shame in using centralized if you’re just trying to buy BTC without losing your mind.
Also, I’ve got a little tip: always check CoinGecko’s exchange page before connecting any wallet. If it’s not listed there with volume or liquidity data, assume it’s a ghost. I’ve saved myself from 3 near-misses this way 😅
Stay safe out there, folks. The crypto world’s wild, but you don’t need to be part of the haunted house tour.
Sandra Lee Beagan
As someone who’s worked in blockchain compliance in Canada, I can tell you this isn’t just risky - it’s a regulatory nightmare waiting to happen. In Canada, even small crypto platforms have to register with FINTRAC and comply with AML/KYC. This? This has no legal footprint. No entity registration. No address. No officers. No nothing.
And here’s the kicker - if someone loses funds here, there’s no recourse. No insurance. No chargeback. No regulator to call. You’re not just trusting a platform - you’re trusting a void.
Also, the name ‘Web3.World’? That’s not branding. That’s a trademark violation waiting to happen. There are actual Web3 organizations with legal rights to that terminology. This feels like someone trying to piggyback on a movement they don’t understand.
Don’t use it. Don’t link to it. Don’t even mention it in a tweet. You’re giving it legitimacy by acknowledging it exists.
michael cuevas
lol i saw this on a subreddit and thought it was a meme. turns out it's real. someone actually made this. and people are trying to use it. i'm not even mad. i'm impressed. like... you built a website that's literally a glitch in the matrix. respect.
Adam Bosworth
Y’all acting like this is some deep mystery. Nah. This is a honeypot. Someone built this to catch dumb wallets. Every time someone connects their MetaMask, they log the private key. Every time someone tries to swap, they drain it. The ‘two tokens’? Fake. The ‘trading pairs’? UI illusions. The site doesn’t even have a backend - it’s just a frontend that calls a script to empty your wallet and say ‘transaction successful.’
I ran a packet capture. It sends your address to a Russian server every time you click ‘swap.’ No one’s trading here. Everyone’s getting robbed. And the silence? That’s the sound of the devs laughing while they cash out.
Stop talking about it like it’s a ‘platform.’ It’s a digital trap. And you’re all standing in it.
ronald dayrit
There’s a philosophical question here that no one’s asking: what does it mean for a system to exist if no one interacts with it meaningfully? Web3.World isn’t just underdeveloped - it’s ontologically ambiguous. Is it a platform? A symbol? A warning? A joke?
It exists in the liminal space between creation and collapse. It has no users, yet it has presence. It has no function, yet it has structure. It has no purpose, yet it demands interpretation.
Perhaps Web3.World is not a failure of engineering - but a success of semiotics. It is the perfect embodiment of the paradox of Web3: the promise of liberation, the reality of obscurity. The more we chase decentralization, the more we build isolated islands. And Web3.World? It’s the island no one visits. The utopia that forgot to invite anyone.
Maybe it’s not broken. Maybe it’s just complete.
And maybe, in its silence, it’s the most honest thing in crypto right now.
Josh Rivera
Oh wow, someone actually wrote a 2000-word essay about a site that doesn’t even have a contact page? Congrats, you just gave this ghost a funeral with a keynote speaker.
It’s two tokens. No app. No docs. No team. You think people are dumb for using it? Nah. You’re dumb for writing a novel about it. Just say ‘don’t use it’ and move on. This isn’t Shakespeare. It’s a placeholder. A typo. A domain squat. Stop pretending it’s a cultural artifact.
And if you’re still reading this? You’re the problem. Go touch grass. Or better yet, go trade on something that actually exists.
Neal Schechter
Quick tip for anyone new to crypto: if you can’t find a single Reddit thread, YouTube video, or Trustpilot review about a platform - it’s either brand new (unlikely) or dead (more likely).
Web3.World is the latter. I’ve been in this space since 2017 and I’ve seen hundreds of these. They pop up, get a few clicks from confused newcomers, then vanish. No one maintains them. No one updates them. They’re digital tombstones.
Don’t waste your time digging into why. Just avoid them. Stick to the big names. They’re not perfect, but they’ve got teams, audits, and support. You don’t need to be a pioneer. You just need to be safe.
And if you’re curious about DeFi? Start with Uniswap. It’s free, open, and has over 10,000 tokens. You don’t need a mystery site with two coins to learn the ropes.
jonathan dunlow
Man, I just checked Web3.World again - still nothing. No updates. No new tokens. No blog. No GitHub commits since 2022. I even checked the domain registration. It’s under a privacy shield. No name. No email. No location.
And the craziest part? Someone just posted a link to it on a crypto Discord server today. Someone new. Fresh meat.
I’m not even mad anymore. I’m just… tired. We keep fighting the same battle. Every week, someone finds a new ghost exchange and thinks it’s the next big thing. And every week, someone loses money. And every week, we write another essay about why it’s bad.
Maybe the real problem isn’t Web3.World. Maybe it’s us. Maybe we’re the ones who keep feeding the ghosts.